top of page
Things That Don't Add Up
Level 7 - Things that don't add up: "The vaccines are safe." "The vaccines are safe." "The vaccines are safe."
Level 7: Text
Level 7: Welcome
The real situation may even be significantly worse than has been presented up to this point (i.e. potentially worse than we have just covered at level 6). How could this possibly be? This is because it has not been possible for long term effects of these vaccines to be assessed yet.
How do governments such as the South Australian government get away with people like Professor Nicola Spurrier, the state's chief medical officer telling the public that the vaccines have gone through all the same safety processes for approval, as all the other vaccines? Clearly, they have not. (See evidence presented at Level 2; Level 3, and Level 6.) Normally vaccine approval takes five to ten years. These vaccines were developed in three to six months. In Australia, all Covid vaccines only have provisional approval. In America, it is called emergency approval.
People who take the COVID vaccines and experience side effects won’t be able to sue Pfizer or Moderna. Most western governments, including the Australian federal government appear to have indemnified Pfizer, Moderna and others. While the detail of these legal arrangements have been keep secret, their is little doubt that such arrangements are in place. (Of course the Australian federal government has set up their no fault indemnity scheme, but the scope of this is very limited but once again this comes from taxpayers funds.) Consequently, Pfizer and Moderna have total immunity from liability in the case if something unintentionally goes wrong with their approved vaccines.
The sad reality is that the experimental period for these vaccines is still very much in place. No one knows the long-term effect of these vaccines. MRNA vaccines have never been used before. The developmental period was extremely short; 3 to 6 months. As stated normally, it is 5 to 10 years; however 5 years is very short and vaccine development often takes longer than this. As stated, thousands of eminent scientists and doctors already believe that antibody dependent enhancement is already currently operating within the community and the vaccines ought to be withdrawn. Previous attempts to use mRNA vaccines never proceeded to public use. They were dropped because test animals failed to survive when re-introduced to natural viruses. How will our immune systems handle these new mRNA vaccines over the longer term? This has not been assessed. Large numbers of our world population are now part of this big experiment.
Around the world there has been some level of success for those resisting the Covid vaccine mandates. (This requires some reflection. See the next section as it provides important evidence.) Indeed in South Australia, as in other parts of the world, there have been some important legal breakthroughs. Although the conflict is still ongoing.
Level 7: Text
.png)
Level 7: About Me
As part of the South Australian Judicial Review into Covid mandates, the above six representative or 'applicants' took part of this process. It is still proceeding. They are:
Deni Varnhagen centre right (healthcare and also AustFootballLW), Courtney Millington (healthcare), Craig Bowyer (education), Kylie Dudson (education), (Adam) Zacary Cook (police) and Rosalyn Smith (police).
Currently, the new South Australian Labor government has temporarily removed mandates for police, and teachers subject to certain reviews. The group Adelaide Freedom Rally has helped to support this legal process. But other states have stricter regimes in place.
The USA has seen similar levels of media and government control in relation to Covid 19 as in Australia. There is greater diversity there however, with Califoria representing what Victoria is to Australia; their most draconian state. Large numbers of people have left both California and Victoria because of heavy-handed practices.
However, this conflict is far from over. Ominous clouds are appearing. The previous Morrison government had made it clear that it planned to introduce laws to combat disinformation and misinformation. There is little doubt the new Albanese Labor government would follow through. Not surprisingly, the critics of this proposed legislation refer to it (in reminiscence of George Orwell's famous book "Nineteen Eighty-Four") as the establishment of a Ministry of Truth. Here is another report here from the Sydney Morning Herald on the same topic. The hierarchy of ALP appears to be pushing this type of legislation even harder than the previous federal government. Similar laws are also being proposed in the US by the Biden administration.
Perhaps one of the saddest things which is occurring is the roll out of the Covid vaccines to children. The Australian federal government is now rolling out Covid vaccines to 5 to 11 year old children. Dr Luc Montagnier, the French Nobel Prize winner virologist labelled this action of giving the Covid vaccines to children as immoral. In fact Montagnier said this much more strongly. He said:
"I am outraged by the fact that we want to vaccinate children, because then we are really affecting a future generation." (More of his quote can be found here.)
A key factor in the claim that giving Covid vaccines to children is immoral is that the evidence shows, greater numbers of children will suffer more from the vaccines themselves, than they will from the Covid disease. Covid death and injury rates for children is close to zero. However, by taking the vaccines, children are exposed to a much greater risks of death and injury. In addition we must also add all the unknown factors of unknown long term effects of this great human experiment.
However, there is another vexing Covid issue which has received little attention. But it connects with the thought that the real situation my be significantly worse than anyone has realized up to this point. We are referring to the use of the drug Remdesivir; the brand name is Veklury.
It is not our intention to introduce discussion about the drug other than to put forward that there are concerning allegations coming to light. If these allegations are correct then - as we asserted toward the end of our argument at level 1 - it would introduce stronger evidence that some agency has attempted to deliberately mislead us. Clearly, if the following claims are correct this is worse than just misleading people.
Here are a number of links in relation to this report:
1. Dr Peterson Pierre
2. Reiner Fuellmich with Dr Ardis
3. Robert F Kennedy Jr's group CHD article (See last photo bottom)
4. Principia Scientifica
5. NBC News
This matter really requires proper analysis in its own right. But it is being mentioned here because strange things are happening in our time. Understandably people are becoming more distrustful of authorities; not only government but our medical authorities.
Click below for next page – Things that do add up and support the idea of mainstream media manipulation.
Next page
Level 7: About Me
Level 7: Pro Gallery
bottom of page